Dont get any worst than this!

White Privilege is a common cry now from Black groups that propagate in many Universities. The notion that whites are somehow more privileged than our counterparts in the black communities.

In order to facilitate this re writing of history, (where African blacks were the first to have slaves or indentured people) it was first necessary to blame all slavery on to whites.

From the ancient Egyptians at least, people were faced with being born and indeed dying at a site that would house a future dead leader was common, if not, a social acceptance. All these people were Black!

Perhaps if we now fast forward a few hundred years and we get to the issue of African American slaves who were loaded on to white vessels by….. African Americans.  They were sold by their own who actively went to populated African areas to capture and then sell to the white slavers.

A downside to this arrangement was when they had exhausted all local victims, they too became the victims, being promptly chained to the boat as the last of possible supply in that area. It must have seemed poetic justice.

This is not to justify slavery at all, just to identify those that are complacent in this very bad period of human atrocities!

It is interesting to note that the term ‘Slave’ is taken from Slav and is indicative of the slavery of whites in places other than Africa, such as Ireland where slavery (of whites) continued well into the 19th century.

This brief account of the fundamentals of Slavery is necessary when considered in the context that black activists would put the blame for all slavery firmly on the shoulders of whites. In doing so, allows them to also blame whites for any future upheaval in their lives as this next article clearly demonstrates.

Medusa Magazine 27/6/2017

****************************************************

Beyond Pro-Choice: The Solution to White Supremacy is White Abortion

In a progressive society, it is often white families that stand in the way of equality and justice. Systemic white supremacy depends, first and foremost, on the white family unit. When white conquerors forcefully penetrated the indigenous, egalitarian homeland of the Native peoples of America, they were quick to replicate their white societies, initiating their parasitism by establishing white plantations, headed by white fathers, submissive white mothers, and, most critically, white children, with full dominion over the enslaved and oppressed people of color that were forced to uphold these micro-fiefdoms.

It is no surprise, then, that America’s fascination with the white family unit has gone hand-in-hand with the historical proliferation of white supremacy. After Bacon’s Rebellion, white micro-fieftans thought it necessary to expand the definition of white family to encompass the entirety of white society, so as to coerce the working class to fight amongst itself based on racial lines. Whites are embedded from birth with the sense of common white identity, and this identity conditions them to replicate the white family unit, thus furthering the cycle of white supremacy in America. That is why the white family unit must be destroyed.

In 1973, the Supreme Court, consisting entirely of men, eight of whom were white, ruled that the termination of pregnancy was constitutional up until the third trimester. For decades, progressives have championed this decision as a victory for the cause of women’s rights. However, it is time we challenge this problematic notion.

First of all, it is critical to understand that the appeal to abortions being “Constitutional” reinforces white supremacy. There is no way around it. The Constitution was drafted and signed by white men, for white men. Slavery was Constitutional. The “right” to terrorize citizens through the bearing of arms is Constitutional. So-called “due process,” in which white juries condone the murder of innocent black men, is a Constitutional process. Being Constitutional does not make something progressive or innately valuable. In fact, Constitutionality is often synonymous with “exclusively beneficial to the white race.”

Second, the notion of “choice” in abortion is inherently white supremacist and ableist. Women of color do not often have the same privilege to choose termination as do white women. For social, religious, economic, and ethical reasons, women of color may experience roadblocks on the path to body autonomy that white women would never be forced to confront due to their privilege of being born in a white supremacist society that continually looks out for their needs. Under present circumstances, women of color simply do not have the absolute choice when it comes to their bodies. It is time to stop pretending that they stand on equal footing with white women, when it has been proven that the embedded systems of white supremacy do not act impartially to all women. Because white supremacy prevents women of color from their freedom to choose, we must level the playing field by other means.

White women: it is time to do your part! Your white children reinforce the white supremacist society that benefits you. If you claim to be progressive, and yet willingly birth white children by your own choice, you are a hypocrite. White women should be encouraged to abort their white children, and to use their freed-up time and resources to assist women of color who have no other choice but to raise their children. Women of color are in need of financial and humanitarian resources. As this white supremacist society continues to imprison black fathers, women of color are forced to stand alone in their plight to raise the next generation of Americans. White women: instead of devoting your time and energy to white children who will reinforce the struggles of women of color, how about asking women of color in what ways you can assist them in their self-liberation? How about adopting children of color who have lost their parents to the destructive white supremacist society that you have enabled and encouraged?

Of course, the best choice is to act preventatively to ensure that white children are not at risk of being born. But in circumstances in which termination and generation are the options, it is best to take advantage of your right to choose, and abort in favor of assisting women of color.

**************************************

I have never in my whole life read anything quite as bad as this suggestion from the incredibly racist blacks.

The strides that have been made toward equality are shadowed in the false narrative of so called white slavery and being exploited to a huge extent by even left wing liberal whites that, if doing just a little research, can nullify such extreme claims.

I personally feel incredibly fearful for a world that not only tolerates this type of rhetoric in a publication, but actually enforces it through political propaganda and selective teaching in Universities, and fully supported by many young whites.

Our collective future does not look good!

Link: Here

Advertisements

Fake News?

There is a legal obligation of everyone (including publications) not to say that which is false. However ALL publications can quote ‘another’ publications comments without penalty.

We have recently seen publications plead ignorance as they quote ‘other sources’ or  sources that do not wish to be identified’

The traditional way of doing investigation by reporters forced them to legitimize their claims, yet today, ‘anonymous sources’ are extremely prevalent. here

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2017/06/26/three-cnn-employees-resign-over-retracted-story-on-russia-ties/?utm_term=.a45d20f1a16d

The point is when should a publication as being accountable….IE Am I responsible if I print something that someone else has reported?

My view is that ANY claim from ANY publication whether quoting another source or not, have to be held accountable….. That is if you print it…(if challenged)…. need to be able to prove it or you should be held accountable for their actions.

The problem is that there are a lynching party out there that act on what publications say. “Hands up don’t shoot’ has been proved to be what caused a riot, and is STILL being used even though demonstrably false.

Additionally those accused of rape etc…. get their justice VERY quickly and the problem is that the justice is meted out by by a public forum instead of a judge.

Teachers that are accused are evicted from their job …regardless.

If you do not force an obligation by publications to report correctly on an issue the repercussions are so much greater than the report itself. For this, they need to be held accountable if the focus of the report is later found to be wrong……. the rule of law should be exercised.

If we believe in fair play…. we should also believe in just reporting!

Poetic justice?

New Jersey college professor fired in wake of heated Fox News interview where she made racially insensitive comments

I watched not believing what I was hearing when my favorite talk show host Tucker Carlson had a really offensive woman by the name of Durden on his show.
This guy has a unique knack for calling people out using my favorite tactic, which is THEIR own argument to defeat themselves.
On the other hand I could be biased…. see what YOU think? Here

Durden, who is black, discussed a Memorial Day event held exclusively for black people hosted by a Black Lives Matter group in New York.

When Carlson asked her her thoughts, Durden interrupted the host, saying: ‘Boo hoo hoo. You white people are angry because you couldn’t use your white privilege card’ to attend the event.’

This woman is (so they say) a college professor, her field is Essex County College adjunct communications, and it seems she has communicated very well. So much so that they have fired her for what her and the likes of Black Lives Matter have been getting so many others fired for. Specifically for this interview.

Durden said the school ‘publicly lynched’ her. The school on Friday said ‘racism cannot be fought with more racism.’

Again we see the victim tactic, when if the situation had been reversed and any white person had something even remotely similar would have been Physically lynched.

My own view is that this shows a MAJOR shift in the position of Universities, who (before the election of Trump) would not have dared in a million years to get rid of this crazy women that teaches kids…… It would have upset the liberal white BLM ……snowflakes too.

“Carlson called her comments during the roughly six-minute interview ‘hostile, separatist and crazy.”  Which just about sums up the whole truth.

Political agendas have entered our teaching spaces where more and more irrational views are forced on children and they are blackmailed into agreeing based on the scores they will receive from people such as this.
The agenda is not teaching but rather brainwashing to achieve their political ends.
I could not have explained it better than this :- Here
I have no white privilege, and if you think you have, the chances are you were taught by Durden or someone very similar. \
You do however have to forgive me for relishing this moment that is long, so very long overdue! Your FIRED!

Benevolent Governments

It seems that Theresa May believes that a $5500 payment to all tenants of Grenfell Tower  is the way forward.

Apparently this payment is made in most cases where the tenant has to move from council provided accommodations to some other alternative.

I would question these payments on the basis of :- 1. The accommodations should be insured by the tenant. 2. Since when does the government have the right to be benevolent.

In the first case, imagine for one minute you are the owner of a private accommodation that gets burned to the ground. Have you ever heard of an instance where the government comes to your door and hands out money? What they would say is you should be insured.

The second case is by far more important, of which I would be happy to put in one weeks salary to this cause, if every politician puts in a weeks salary.

The reason for this is that we do not pay government to collect taxes to draw on it as if a private bank account to dish out to whomever they decide needs a handout. The only amount sanctioned by the people is enough to keep the government functional and no more.

The notion that you can create a bottomless pit to throw money that is all too apparent in every phase of government , leaving the legacy to be paid by our children in the future.

Additionally history shows us, that to the permanently unemployed classes, they will vote ONLY for those that create the most personal benefit for them. In other words under the guise of being benevolent, they are really obtaining votes simply on the basis of freebee’s they can accumulate.

This can also be said for refugees and others that take advantage of a free social care system. At some point the takers will outnumber the providers by a long way, and make the burden so horrendous that the system will collapse…. it MUST collapse!

So to return to my offer of one weeks salary I would be more than happy to help those in need…….. If all members of government would do the same….. and would vouch right now that not a single one would do so!