Benevolent Governments

It seems that Theresa May believes that a $5500 payment to all tenants of Grenfell Tower  is the way forward.

Apparently this payment is made in most cases where the tenant has to move from council provided accommodations to some other alternative.

I would question these payments on the basis of :- 1. The accommodations should be insured by the tenant. 2. Since when does the government have the right to be benevolent.

In the first case, imagine for one minute you are the owner of a private accommodation that gets burned to the ground. Have you ever heard of an instance where the government comes to your door and hands out money? What they would say is you should be insured.

The second case is by far more important, of which I would be happy to put in one weeks salary to this cause, if every politician puts in a weeks salary.

The reason for this is that we do not pay government to collect taxes to draw on it as if a private bank account to dish out to whomever they decide needs a handout. The only amount sanctioned by the people is enough to keep the government functional and no more.

The notion that you can create a bottomless pit to throw money that is all too apparent in every phase of government , leaving the legacy to be paid by our children in the future.

Additionally history shows us, that to the permanently unemployed classes, they will vote ONLY for those that create the most personal benefit for them. In other words under the guise of being benevolent, they are really obtaining votes simply on the basis of freebee’s they can accumulate.

This can also be said for refugees and others that take advantage of a free social care system. At some point the takers will outnumber the providers by a long way, and make the burden so horrendous that the system will collapse…. it MUST collapse!

So to return to my offer of one weeks salary I would be more than happy to help those in need…….. If all members of government would do the same….. and would vouch right now that not a single one would do so!

Are Liberals really Liberal?

Definition:

“Open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values.”

I have tried to define what political affiliation I have for some years now, mostly without real success, leading me to the conclusion I don’t really have one.

I mean, when it comes to social issues, I agree with many of the Democratic/labour points of view. On the issues of economics I align with the Conservative/Republican view of the world.

The fringe groups in between these I hardly ever pay much attention to, as, all my thoughts are very definitely right or left of the pack, and not very often sitting on the fence. Depending on the issue.

I fail to see how we can move forward without a social justice. I fail how we can be upstanding members of the community unless we are productive.

So I suppose the definition of a Liberal could also partially apply to my thinking….          Open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values, even so, do not regard myself as remotely being a Liberal!

What strikes me as being odd is the intolerance that those that label themselves as ‘liberal’ have toward others that disagree with their views.

Where the most recent norm seems to be at Universities, to shout down or exercise obstruction to stop people they do not agree with……. taking the floor! thereby stifling the free speech that they profess to hold dear!

What is easily noticeable is the tack of groups that would otherwise by implication be termed as aggressive. They use a intelligent attack, forcing the frustration of their antagonist Liberals to become violent instead, IE…. no contact at all!

Those groups do not seem to argue with police, stick to the agreed demarcation lines, and do not invoke the wrath of the establishment by challenging police authority.

Nationalistic parties are getting very smart in all countries as well as popular. Just a few years back they were ostracized because of their aggressive behavior and today they are getting respectability.

Take Le pen in France, National Front in the UK, American Front. Once each were labelled with force to get their way, but now seem more approachable to the ideas of democracy, and in every case they are getting more votes.

That’s not of course an assumption that they are more reasonable, but as in all politics, they are putting across their view in the only way you can…… by appearing reasonable, as indeed…..is the only way you can become popular.

By contrast the ‘Liberals’ shout down the oppositions 1st amendment and in so many cases adopt passive obstruction.

This of course is a technique that major politicians practice in Filibustering a motion in the US that, where they have no chance of winning a debate can simply run the available time out on the clock for debate.

In an unsuccessful attempt to derail passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1957, Thurmond made the longest filibuster ever conducted by a single senator, speaking for a total of 24 hours and 18 minutes. (He was at this time a democrat)

Typically these filibusters could be talking about watching plants grow, or looking at paint dry. Some read the phone book, cite recipes for fried oysters, or read the Declaration of Independence.

Passive obstruction to move their case forward, or rather, not to move the case forward, and, as long as they stay conscious, and do not leave the floor they can keep on going, where only the length of time they can hold their bladder is their only limit.

The new liberal takes on a new extreme. For instance, in law you have to actually touch someone to commit assault, and yet finger pointing or getting in someones face, can be as close as you wish…….. as long as you do not actually touch.

If you were to apply this to your resident film star, politician, or a police officer…..go straight to jail, do not pass go, and do not collect 200! but to ordinary people in the street the Ultra Liberal can go to the limit of actual a minuscule distance from your face, and still claim they did not touch!

The provocation will go to any length such as spitting, tearing down legitimate signage etc to make you lose your cool and should you?….indeed you will go to jail!

As a young lad I learned this from first hand experience. I was at an English pub with my wife and was accused by a strange landlord of molesting her. (I had my hand around her waist) I drank up and left the establishment, swearing to myself that tomorrow….. I will fix this guy.

I spoke of the event to our local Confucius guy who was all wise and logical that I used to work with. He said what are you going to do to him when you go back. I told him that I was gonna thump him for embarrassing my wife so much.

He said just ask him WHY. Don’t touch him at all.

When I walked in the pub it was packed. “I wonder if I could just have a quiet word with you…….”… immediately the landlord went into a tirade where his face was turning blue and yelling at the top of his voice.

The event culminated in his own regulars berating him for being so nasty. I came out (if the truth were told I was asked to leave by him, or he was going to beat me up) feeling on top of the world…….. I was on top and won the event easily , with him looking foolish in front of all and sundry.

Passive resistance works, I would just question whether using it to obstruct the view of the other guy, is something that should be used by free thinking liberals who believe in everyone’s right to opinion.

 

 

Muslim or Not?

The current wave of atrocities done in the name of the Muslim faith are spanning the whole globe.

From London to Russia, the USA to the Philippines. It seems that the Muslim faith drags in many believers and a certain element of extreme people, that believe in taking their writings to the extreme.

The left wing, bless em! in their very brave attempt to De-stigmatize and make all peoples neutral with equal say and balance for all, is demonstrated in so many circles and on so many levels its hard to shrug this off as a fad.

The extreme leftists like Corbyn and the ‘New Labour Party’ with snowflake liberals that continually fight all aspects of the system to enhance a populist belief in full integration.

US universities attempt to alleviate any concerns by pushing their system farther to left and consequentially more extreme.

One School took it upon themselves to give Christian children lessons in Islam taken to the extreme of actually praying.

As you notice in the film, many parents are upset and yet the board are eager to cut all people off after just being allowed two minutes to state their case, seemingly oblivious to these concerns of parents.

I am not anti Islam, or anti any religion, but if any religion preaches the opposite of what they are being allowed when welcomed to other countries then assimilation will be impossible for future generations.

Anjem Choudary makes absolutely no secret of his aspirations for the future, and is never apologetic for the violence, using tactics of aversion, or denial to put his message across.

Even to the extent of claiming Sharia Law will be the law of the UK one day, yet still left-wing politicians do nothing at all to attempt to stop this hatred at its core level being propagated.

True Choudary was jailed, but for the wrong reasons and it does little to stem the flow of laws that are incompatible with most western societies.

Perhaps that flow can never be stopped if our leaders have a fundamentally different agenda to the people that elect them. A fairly good analogy could be demonstrated in this video…..

It seems that there is actually no problem with radical Muslims at all. They are not actually part of the faith and instead are a separate series of individuals acting on their own independently their holy leaders like Choudary.

As such, according to politicians, you cannot tar a whole faith with the same brush!

Beheaded

This man is not a Muslim Terrorist it would seem. His belief however is that any infidel deserves this treatment and is one of seven billion that are happy to hand out the same punishment to all, from Coptic Christians to British troops on our streets.

It would seem that peoples that have escaped countries that practice Sharia Law are intent on bringing it back for themselves in future generations in their new found homelands.

C6bsia4XEAA3KPM

Even when they still suffer the same extreme penalties of an antiquated religion.

Sharia law_001

This falls nothing short of an erosion of the western society with an active target of spreading their faith with total eradication of any that specifically do not subscribe to their faith.

For instance if I deny Allah and take a stance of say…. an atheist……. this religion believes that anyone that kills me is not guilty of any offense!

That cannot be compatible with any western sort of thinking!

Mikhail Gorbachev: ‘It All Looks as if the World Is Preparing for War’

Words of wisdom from a expert. The idea that we can win a war by using nuclear missiles  is a long outdated idea that only fools and the deranged could consider.

As the Doomsday clock moved closer to midnight yesterday many are totally oblivious of its implications.

Obama ordered troops to every single country that borders Russia. Not only tactical weapons such as tanks and rocket launchers, but nuclear weapons too.

So close in fact that should a mistake occur there is virtually no chance to either self destruct or recall the weapon, making war inevitable.

Gorbachev is clear in what he sees as an introduction to war ……

“While state budgets are struggling to fund people’s essential social needs, military spending is growing. Money is easily found for sophisticated weapons whose destructive power is comparable to that of the weapons of mass destruction; for submarines whose single salvo is capable of devastating half a continent; for missile defense systems that undermine strategic stability.”

Which is all too true. The countries that fair the best are new Zealand Canada Australia Germany and those that have huge armies have the worst standard of living.

China is the only one that seems to have a balance but even so because of threats of the US they have now installed nuclear weapons on islands that were in dispute with some of its neighbors, simply because the US threatened to intervene.

The Chinese gave a stern warning just a couple of weeks ago letting the US in no uncertain terms that they have the firepower and capability to be more than a match for the US.

They would be of course…but not in the way so many may believe. Their men are better disciplined. Are capable of carrying out absolute instructions with precision.

They have recently commissioned a new aircraft carrier, but their main attack force are subs. Moving by stealth and carrying multiple nuclear missiles that could right now be sitting outside NY City.

Pilot-less drones being manufactured by the hundreds and some nuclear capable.

The only ray of sunshine is Trump, who is very critical of war, and has been reaching out (at least to Russia) to alleviate concerns. That may not be enough and a gesture of sensibility and his commitment may be to get all weapons off the Russian borders as soon as possible.

Warnings from the so called enemy of the west can be read here

Twitter Ban?

OK… I cannot lie…. Twitter have suspended my account again.

The last time I had to give a new email addy to get back on line. This time I am not going to bother….

Its seems I am too outspoken for the Silly Juvenile Wombats (SJW’s) that presumably have complained , to the equally juvenile Twitter bots …..that I was nasty to them.

Perhaps I was as I am not really absolutely sure…..

In any event….Mark… your social site is wonderful at the moment , but if your gonna suspend guys like me …. it wont last long!

Oh…what did I do for this suspension????

Here is the Tweet………..

fat-women

This woman thinks she is fat.

Either call her fat or stop calling Bruce Jenner and Bradley Manning “women”.

Thanks Mark!

 

 

Fake news??

With CNN Credibility in Tatters Anderson Cooper Attempts To Defend Propaganda…

Anderson is wrong but just keeps bending the view .

However James Clapper did put the matter in perspectve.

DNI Clapper Statement on Conversation with President-elect Trump

Wednesday, January 11, 2017

DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
WASHINGTON, DC  20511

January 11, 2017

DNI Clapper Statement on Conversation with President-elect Trump
This evening, I had the opportunity to speak with President-elect Donald Trump to discuss recent media reports about our briefing last Friday. I expressed my profound dismay at the leaks that have been appearing in the press, and we both agreed that they are extremely corrosive and damaging to our national security.

We also discussed the private security company document, which was widely circulated in recent months among the media, members of Congress and Congressional staff even before the IC became aware of it. I emphasized that this document is not a U.S. Intelligence Community product and that I do not believe the leaks came from within the IC. The IC has not made any judgment that the information in this document is reliable, and we did not rely upon it in any way for our conclusions. However, part of our obligation is to ensure that policymakers are provided with the fullest possible picture of any matters that might affect national security.

President-elect Trump again affirmed his appreciation for all the men and women serving in the Intelligence Community, and I assured him that the IC stands ready to serve his Administration and the American people.

James R. Clapper, Director of National Intelligence

 

Convinced Now????

So lets start a War

So the outgoing President decides that sanctions are necessary against Russia. The guy that always has a really good take on circumstance is Newt….. experienced and smart and brings up a very good point.

And the point: “What was the basis of his sanctions, he had a bad morning, he had a hunch……Whats going on here?”

BUSTED: FBI Never Even Examined the DNC Servers Over Allegations of Russian Hacking
Read more here

According to a report, the FBI has never examined the servers of the Democratic National Committee — not even for the six months during which the bureau claimed to be investigating allegations of Russians compromising cyber networks.

In fact, according to a US intelligence official who spoke toBuzzfeed News, “the bureau has still not requested access to the hacked servers, a DNC spokesman said. No US government entity has run an independent forensic analysis on the system.”

While it would seem intuitive for the U.S. Intelligence Community to perform a detailed and methodical analysis of its own, Eric Walker, deputy communications director for the DNC, told Buzzfeed,

“The DNC had several meetings with representatives of the FBI’s Cyber Division and its Washington (DC) Field Office, the Department of Justice’s National Security Division, and U.S. Attorney’s Offices, and it responded to a variety of requests for cooperation, but the FBI never requested access to the DNC’s computer servers,”  Walker told BuzzFeed News in an email.

So Apparently Obama has acted when the FBI and the CIA have not even given him the details, and instead relied on information that the DNC has provided, that NONE of the intelligence agencies can even agree on as being hacked by Russians!

Although the FBI declined to comment on the report, it’s notable the bureau has relied solely on third-party technology security company, CrowdStrike — whose controversial report early last year noted Russia-linked hackers penetrated DNC systems — for its analysis and assessment, rather than performing one of its own.

But the official who spoke with Buzzfeed — and expressed confidence Russia coordinated the ostensible ‘widespread hacks’ — didn’t exactly add an air of confidence to the CrowdStrike report, noting,

“CrowdStrike is pretty good. There’s no reason to believe that anything that they have concluded is not accurate.”

So we have a 3rd Party outside source that is the ONLY one who claims hacking and that came from the DNC which Obama has apparently acted on.

Additionally the guy who received the information is Julian Assange who denies absolutely that the Russians supplied the information, which it seems came through a British third party so the supplier would always remain anonymous.

 

So where is Obama going with this? There are a couple of options as I see it.

  1. Obama is trying very hard to destabilize the President Elects first term in any way he can.
  2. Obama is actually leading up to a conflict on either Russian borders or in the Indian ocean where as much fiery talk has been apparent with he NK government.
  3. Or is there something even more ominous ahead and before inauguration day, where some sort of contesting of Trumps loyalty to the USA which would somehow lay the foundations for impeachment from day one.

Whatever the case Obama seems to be acting independently of all intelligence offices and generally speaking….. without a support and tangible proof in any shape or form.

The Democratic establishment do not seem to be prepared to go without a fight, that may well be of monumental proportions.