Muslim or Not?

The current wave of atrocities done in the name of the Muslim faith are spanning the whole globe.

From London to Russia, the USA to the Philippines. It seems that the Muslim faith drags in many believers and a certain element of extreme people, that believe in taking their writings to the extreme.

The left wing, bless em! in their very brave attempt to De-stigmatize and make all peoples neutral with equal say and balance for all, is demonstrated in so many circles and on so many levels its hard to shrug this off as a fad.

The extreme leftists like Corbyn and the ‘New Labour Party’ with snowflake liberals that continually fight all aspects of the system to enhance a populist belief in full integration.

US universities attempt to alleviate any concerns by pushing their system farther to left and consequentially more extreme.

One School took it upon themselves to give Christian children lessons in Islam taken to the extreme of actually praying.

As you notice in the film, many parents are upset and yet the board are eager to cut all people off after just being allowed two minutes to state their case, seemingly oblivious to these concerns of parents.

I am not anti Islam, or anti any religion, but if any religion preaches the opposite of what they are being allowed when welcomed to other countries then assimilation will be impossible for future generations.

Anjem Choudary makes absolutely no secret of his aspirations for the future, and is never apologetic for the violence, using tactics of aversion, or denial to put his message across.

Even to the extent of claiming Sharia Law will be the law of the UK one day, yet still left-wing politicians do nothing at all to attempt to stop this hatred at its core level being propagated.

True Choudary was jailed, but for the wrong reasons and it does little to stem the flow of laws that are incompatible with most western societies.

Perhaps that flow can never be stopped if our leaders have a fundamentally different agenda to the people that elect them. A fairly good analogy could be demonstrated in this video…..

It seems that there is actually no problem with radical Muslims at all. They are not actually part of the faith and instead are a separate series of individuals acting on their own independently their holy leaders like Choudary.

As such, according to politicians, you cannot tar a whole faith with the same brush!

Beheaded

This man is not a Muslim Terrorist it would seem. His belief however is that any infidel deserves this treatment and is one of seven billion that are happy to hand out the same punishment to all, from Coptic Christians to British troops on our streets.

It would seem that peoples that have escaped countries that practice Sharia Law are intent on bringing it back for themselves in future generations in their new found homelands.

C6bsia4XEAA3KPM

Even when they still suffer the same extreme penalties of an antiquated religion.

Sharia law_001

This falls nothing short of an erosion of the western society with an active target of spreading their faith with total eradication of any that specifically do not subscribe to their faith.

For instance if I deny Allah and take a stance of say…. an atheist……. this religion believes that anyone that kills me is not guilty of any offense!

That cannot be compatible with any western sort of thinking!

Trump for good or Bad?

Being an avid ready of alternative groups ( working on the theory that the mainstream media lies to us all the time) like “The Conservative Treehouse” who predicted back in March the rise and subsequent election of Trump by a strong margin, I put a bet on that he would win. Its nice to beat the bookies.

I wonder what would have happened if I turned up to get my winnings and the bookie says I get nothing! He says that although I picked the right person he is not going to pay because he is changing the rules…….? So now I lose because he has changed the rules. Crazy eh? What would YOU do?

This week has seen demonstrators out for their fourth night on the streets. There were protests in New York, Los Angeles, Miami, Salt Lake City, Las Vegas, Kansas City, Chicago and Washington DC and violence in Portland.

Most of the protestors seem to be young college students with BLM and Gays rights being thrown in for good measure. These young people are backed up by those in the news that were swearing they would leave the USA for good if Trump were voted in, and those same actresses, actors, comedians, are now subject to a poll on RT  as to whether they should be FORCED to leave as they were so outspoken.

It is sad that people in the news would interfere in the voting process at all. To state how they would vote I see as being legitimate, to actively try to persuade by using your popularity seems to be bad form.

To not carry out your threat to leave seems worse still. The least that Robert, Barbara and the like could do is carry out their threat, but instead dismiss it as a joke.

Its only a joke when people laugh, and riots are no laughing matter!

 

The Rascist Huffington Post

I have for the last couple of years been posting at the Huff. I started posting as the Zimmerman case became prevalent, and then only because of what was blatant one sided reporting. Since then I have seen the pattern of the posters, their tactics and the racism of the editorial.

So much so that it virtually becomes impossible to comment unless you have the same one sided opinion as the Huff…. and of course follow the ‘Party Line..’ The Zimmerman and Dunn cases get particular attention these days……

Take for instance this post by Marian Wright Edelman

Killed by a Gun

Take the first couple of lines…..

The headlines in the case were sadly familiar. An angry adult armed with a gun used it to shoot and kill an unarmed black teenager he thought seemed “bad”—this time, because the teenager and his friends were sitting in a car listening to music the grownup didn’t like. In this outrageous Florida case, a middle-aged white man, Michael Dunn, was convicted of three counts of attempted murder and one count of shooting a gun into an occupied car.

Although in the Case of Zimmerman and Dunn, both were investigated by the  FBI no issues of race were connected to either case. Yet notice the keys words designed to make you think it was about race. If we modify the sentence above to read correctly, what do we get?

The headlines in the case were sadly familiar. An angry adult armed with a gun used it to shoot and kill an unarmed teenager he thought seemed “bad”—this time, because the teenager and his friends were sitting in a car listening to music the grownup didn’t like. In this outrageous Florida case, a middle-aged man, Michael Dunn, was convicted of three counts of attempted murder and one count of shooting a gun into an occupied car.

The tone becomes very different when you take out those couple of all important keywords that may demonstrate the point of racism.

Jurors agreed he faced no threat after he was annoyed by loud music — coming from a car he had deliberately chosen to park next to — and then started an argument, pulled a gun on the car’s black teens, and fired three shots at the young men inside the car as they tried to drive away from him.

In the first instance the wording implied that Dunn was seeking out the kids, the black kids, and is misleading.

What actuallly happened is that :-

The bass from loud music playing in the teens’ SUV started to shake both cars and bother Dunn, who asked for it to be turned down.Front seat passenger Tevin Thompson initially complied, but then Jordan Davis objected and Thompson turned the music back up. Davis and Dunn continued to talk to each other, with Davis cursing and becoming enraged while Dunn remained relatively calm. Meanwhile, Stornes returned to the vehicle.

See the whole article here

My point of course is not the actual event, it is the presentation of the event by this author, and the acceptance by the Huffington post that this piece reflects what happened in this case. That is a very racial piece of innuendo that is chronically one sided and does not present a factual account of the case.

The piece by Marian Wright Edelmanis who is President of the Children’s Defense Fund and its Action Council whose Leave No Child Behind® mission is to ensure every child a Healthy Start, a Head Start, a Fair Start, a Safe Start, and a Moral Start in life and successful passage to adulthood with the help of caring families and communities.That is of course if we are talking about Black children.

What of course which makes matters worst is that if you post on the Huffington post anything contradictory to this biased version of events then your post will be deleted.

The deletion of posts is another interesting feature of the now gone global post where individuals can be moderators of posts, and indeed the actual moderators appear to restrict posts on the basis of whether or not those posts follow the main editorial.

In the Zimmerman case the BGI trolls were out in force, for many hours day after day, putting down and getting posts deleted if they supported Zimmerman in any way at all. To get a post deleted from the huff, just flag it, and that in itself is not the problem, and in itself will not get the post deleted, but as soon as the trolls get together collectively and complain about a piece in sufficient numbers, the piece will be automatically deleted.

It is not the Post that has deleted the piece of course, and cannot be blamed for that, but they are aware that this occurred, and allow it to happen by the regular black trolls of the BGI, (which they can be blamed for) so promoting their agenda and suppressing any other opinions that are not in keeping with the racial agitation , and false narrative promoted simply by forced omission of balanced comment.

Black College Instructor Claims She Was Punished For Discussing Racism

This is another example of biased one sided reporting…… if you actually check out the article: HERE

What we actually find is that three white students at an English class wanted to know the relevance of structural racism to the class and why it was recurring.

The problem here is of course not the topic but the attitude of the teacher, (who has been involved in similar incidents) pointing these students to the complaints department, instead of legitimizing the significance in the class of this particular piece.

Another piece on the same day is :- Here

To Wake Up Dangerous: on Thugs and the Criminalization of Black People

Well now we have the use of words again selectively inserted or omitted to get the correct interpretation……

“There is a war on Black people in America; it has been raging for a while. Since slavery, Black people have been colored as savage, unclean, sexually and socially deviant and criminal. This war is fought in courtrooms which feed our prison system, in our media which feeds archaic stereotypes and in our schools which feed long term socioeconomic inequality. The war has become so complex and intersected that Black America is constantly fighting for survival across all classes and identities.”

This piece is about the word ‘THUG’ and the manner its being used……. and cites several examples of the so called misuse of the word.

‘Consider America’s favorite “thug,” Richard Sherman’ states the article where Sherman behaved bad enough to be deemed a thug by the media…. and the article goes on to …….

“As we learned from the recent acquittal of Michael Dunn, killing black people will never receive justice or retribution. Jordan Davis, who would have turned nineteen years old this past Sunday, was gunned down in a gas station for refusing to turn down his music when Dunn requested. Davis, with three friends, was unarmed. A day of teenagers hanging out ended in death and injury. Black boys on the town became “thugs.” The violence that sits in this word is how it works to make black life irreverent as so expertly put by Ta-Nehisi Coates. The mistrial that followed only further reveals the lack of value on Black life and how racial epithets like “thug” and “nigger” are tools of dehumanization. We have seen it with Emmitt Till, Trayvon Martin and Renisha McBride. Even in death, though, Black people are made commodity.”

This misguided post (which was published as being authentic by the Post) implies Dunn was acquitted…. he was acquitted of 1st degree murder only…. to give a retrial. It gives no mention of the lad turning the music UP! (which is a thuggish gesture) and yet we see the BGI rack up and collate several examples such as Till, (which was an abysmal issue) and put it side by side with Trayvon Martin (beating a gues head into concrete not thuggish??) and Mc Bride, who appeared on a guys doorstep drunk and he shot her accidentally.

That author says Even in death, though, Black people are made commodity.”

Try the Trayvon Martin foundation and the patented names that make it illegal to use this name in advertising unless you are paying royalties……. Blacks are commodity , simply ask Ben Kruidbos, Jesse Jackson, and Al Sharpton who all live very well indeed on selling any black name…….

These are just some of the examples of the Huffingtons racial and ongoing bias against whites……… Racist…… well YOU judge……

Stand Your Ground Has No Moral Ground by Jim Wallace

The Noose, Ole Miss, and Free Speech Geoffrey R. Stone

Calling on Leaders to Repeal ‘Stand Your Ground’  Sharpton

It’s Time to Separate Race and U.S. Firearms Policy    John Roman, Ph.D.

Are just some of the examples of one sidedness…..