The Labour party in the UK have suffered a very bad showing in local elections even though they were predicted to have massive gains.

This has been attributed to their stance on Antisemitism. There are fundamental reasons why they lost, most of which is that they are simply out of touch with the electorate.

But in this article I do not want to discuss the Labour party, but the underlying trend that goes unnoticed as it is fed to us little by little for the agenda and ultimate aims of those in power.

The real reason is to promote the agenda of Israel and their long term strategy.

Just as the word Holocaust has been hijacked. This usage came about gradually. The lower-case “holocaust” has described the violent deaths of large groups of people probably since the 18th century, according the Oxford English Dictionary.More info here

Today you are pretty well forbidden from using this term for anything other than the Jewish Holocaust.

I would say that there is only one primary reason for utilizing this term and that is for the Jewish nation to keep their cause uppermost in all peoples minds, and their cause??? to take back all lands that surround or are part of Jerusalem.

Mass killings are as old as man himself. We find invade and populate every new area and then obliterate all the indigenous so we can claim for ourselves……

I am not trying to minimize the deaths of those Jews in the war (Antisemitism) but merely comparing how could the Jewish event be more ‘Holocaust’ than that of the deaths by the Romans…. Armenians…. the many that have suffered at the hands of Pol Pot, Stalin, Americans, the Spanish etc…..?

But the Jewish cause is to pay politicians, own publications, cause any monstrosity to win back all of Palestine for their own contravening, just about every humanitarian law on the planet, and the West actively supports this by not protecting the rights of others under post war agreements that were signed.

The Jews need to set their cause as being different from every other cause … hence the Capital letter H in Holocaust. I would argue that a Jews death is no more important than any other mans forceful demise….. or are we to accept that they are the chosen people? All deaths are sad………….

But is my criticism fair in my mind or is it Antisemitism? When the Labour Party says its Pro Palestinian…… To the Israelis it is seen as Antisemitism.





At Last……Sensibility

Today the 28th December 2017 I have had great pleasure in listening to a YouTube video from a USA Professor.

American University professor, Peter Kuznick, destroys the WWII myths that have underscored US foreign policy since 1945. Peter co-authored The Untold History of the United States with Oliver Stone.

This man gives a very serious detail of misplaced US foreign policy going back to 1945 in layman’s terms that logistically reasons the events that have put us in an horrendous situation today…..

This is probably going to be our epitaph of stupidity if we are not smart enough to see where we have gone wrong, and do something about it.

Absolutely brilliant

We have so little time to change……………………………………………


Fact or Fiction NK

This last couple of months has started the whole of the internet buzzing as to how do we handle North Korea…. My Answer?…. Its too late!

NK is the product of our foolishness, our desire for power and dominance in every sphere. This of course makes all around us either in awe or afraid of the powerful war machine, or makes us resentful and forced to be humbled.

Looking at this map of nuclear tests has to scare just about anyone that wants to live.

When your labelled as a little crazy fat man by a sitting US President in a country where you are revered to like a god……Its kind of personally insulting to say the least.

So the war machine goes on, and our window of opportunity is now nil, well unless the US wishes to end the lives of at least a million, and perhaps tens of millions.

The US has around 40 thousand troops nearby apart from civilians of SK, Japan,etc that make obvious first strike targets..


The whole of this week has been surrounded by the latest test of NK missile test that confirms it has the ability to hit the USA with something.


Why has the North Korean regime pursued a nuclear programme?

Much of the regime’s domestic legitimacy rests on portraying the country as under constant threat from the US and its regional allies, South Korea and Japan.

To support the claim that it is in Washington’s crosshairs, North Korea cites the tens of thousands of US troops lined up along the southern side of the demilitarised zone – the heavily fortified border dividing the Korean peninsula. Tensions rise every spring at the start of joint military drills involving US and South Korean forces. North Korea insists the drills are a rehearsal for an invasion.

Faced with what it says are US provocations, North Korea says it has as much right as any other state to develop a nuclear deterrent.

North Korea’s leader Kim Jong-un is also aware of the fate of other dictators who lacked nuclear weapons or were forced to give them up.


While no doubt the USA is calculating how it can inflict the maximum pain on this upstart (who since 2006 has been in possession of nuclear weapons) every option is on the table to bring him to heel.

The US arsenal is huge, so he must lose, which is why he would fire off every single weapon he has if he believes he is under attack.

B52’s in their droves would descend, but would be much too late for the 40K plus troops of the USA, their frigates destroyers and aircraft carriers within 600 miles or so and all the people of SK and japan are duly concerned.

The most formidable drone ever is the Reaper. A autonomous search and destroy killing machine that is formidable to say the least.

The fact that this week Kim has confirmed he can reach around two thirds of the USA adds another ingredient to the flavor, particularly if he lets off all missiles because of a supposed attack.

AEGIS is lacking in so many ways and failures he is sure to hit some targets on USA soil, so bursting the USA dominance bubble.

So its decided he will lose and a mass annihilation is inevitable….. or is it?

On the 4th July NK launch it first intercontinental ballistic missile

Analysis by Japan and South Korea has supported the account given by North Korea’s Academy of Defence Science, which said the missile reached an altitude of 1,741 miles (2,802km) and flew 580 miles.

And although the public and foolish reporters may not have noticed there is something that perhaps North Korea was trying to put across to avoid any immediate action.

The space station is at an orbit of about 250 miles…. in relatively low orbit….. and the 4th july missile went seven times the height.

The GPS satellites are at a height of 12000 miles though, and with a slightly different missile NK’s rockets could be adapted and with just a little more advancement in technology.

That is the direction I believe NK will go to be assured of a no strike on it by any of the players in this scenario.

To lose the satellites means losing the Reaper, B52’s, every aircraft carrier and warship. No missile could be launched, and most ground based systems of infantry will have absolutely no idea where they are.

Many vehicles just would not go because of the reliance on GPS, in particular public transport, perhaps even your car, and you wont be hoping on any civilian plane.

And all without a single life being lost!

If he can do it….he will do it that is for sure, and we have not even considered the other players in this foolish game that governments play!

As I am not a tactical expert and think of this….. you can believe that Russia, and China thought of this many years ago, and giving that final technology to NK would enhance their pawns in the game.

Even without it…. a nuclear strike on NK spells disaster for all involved.

AS in the film ‘Wargames’……. “The only solution Dr Falken…….


Banned again

In the Daily Mail they ran a story…..

Shocking video shows the moment a male chimp was pummeled to death by SEVEN other primates in their enclosure after falling 40 feet from a tree while fighting

My comment was:-
Does it remind you of any particular race?
The Mail banned me for life………………………….. LOL
According to them….. they received lots of complaints….
It appears I am getting penalized for what their readers have associated with the comment…..
Hey….. if it was too close to home….and the cap fits…. wear it!

Lawyer do’and dont’s

Nothing can be more profound and exhausting as going to court, whether you are defendant, or plaintiff…………. Its hell…… But having had a recent court case and along the way learned a couple of things that I didn’t know when we started, I feel a bit more educated about it now.

So here a couple of Do’s and Don’ts that if I were starting again, I would change…….


If your the plaintiff, the onus is on you to prove your case. In a civil case in most parts of the world you are required to prove past the threshold of 51%. This figure is a really nonsensical assessment because there are degrees (after 51%) that the judge will take into consideration.

#1: Don’t go to see a lawyer with a view to going to court unless you really mean to do it.

A bit of self help at the start is a really good thing after you have cooled down and can be a good starting point as to an outcome long before you step through that leaches door!

Firstly you have been wronged…. or have you? Be critical of yourself. Write down and number all the points for bringing a case (all the facts) and then write down all the points against, no matter how remote. If your for list does not exceed your against list significantly……… do not go to court.

The premise of this is that your opposing counsel will drag every single point that you ever made, and turn you into a money grabbing demon that would probably rape Mother Theresa if he takes his eyes off you!

#2: Don’t bring a frivolous case to a court.

The judge gets upset with you, and, seeing she has direct access to your wallet and can rape it if you look the wrong way at her….. make sure you have not only a good legal case, but a good moral one too.

Because you hate the other guy with a passion is no reason to bring a case, unless you have a very big fat check book. Make the case easy for the judge, and you will have rewards.

#3: Don’t tell your lawyer everything!

I had very honest lawyer, a good family man, does not beat the wife, goes to church, and does everything by the book!….and consequently will act on every single thing you tell him adhering strictly to the law. The problem here being… he is an exception rather than the rule…… the others do not play fair. Tell him what is relevant.

#4 Do you have a case?

Can you actually prove what you say. As a plaintiff, its up to you. If you have ‘He said, I said’ you will most likely lose. True you may be able to come up with 51% but that will only give you your costs  back (possibly) What do you have written down? do you have a contract? Do you have a witness to the contract? In short Now Prove It.

#5 What is a contract?

If you Google this you will find that a contract is simply a promise to do something get something or give something for another something. The promise can be in many forms, it does not have to be written.


The elements of a contract are “offer” and “acceptance” by “competent persons” having legal capacity who exchange “consideration” to create “mutuality of obligation.”

Once you really get into this there are lots of conditions to what may or what may not be a contract, but we are not gonna get into absolutes of each case, the fundamentals are Offer and Acceptance, but when standing alone cannot form a contract. Remember a judge has to decide on what you can prove, and he has no way of making a decision on what you or the defendant thought you meant (in which case you lose)

So I have bought a car, I offered $1000 and the defendant accepted $1000 dollars. Is this a contract? no way! not to a judge anyway! For instance if you give him the keys, because he says he will bring the cash around, you are totally screwed, and he has your car, because you did not define when!

So now he pays up you have not had your money for 6 months, and lost all interest so you take him to court ….. and you will get NADA! Why ? because you did not say there is a penalty at the start!

#6 Do I need a lawyer to write the contract?

No you dont, unless its a complicated case, particularly involving several parties to both sides, in which case you need to be absolute about who is doing what! Just make sure you have. (But because you are thinking litigation, I guess you have already passed that point!)

Offer I have a thousand tons of sand…….. I will sell for X per ton
Acceptance: I will buy a thousand tons of sand…… at X per ton
Offer/Payment: You will pay today/ next week/ next year/ never.
Acceptance/Payment: I will pay today/ next week/ next year/ never.
Offer/When: I will deliver on this date.
Acceptance/when: I will receive on this date.

Conditions: if you do or if I don’t

Lawyers are instinctively leaches, its born and bred into them, (in fact we should really have a legal cull of lawyers twice every year). They write laws for which they are paid a great deal of money, and then even more money to decipher those same laws….. you need to employ them them to clarify what they meant, or do you?

#7 Now consult a lawyer.

You need do nothing more than send a demand for payment, and, give a time you will take action if you do not get satisfaction. All the other stuff a lawyer wants to discuss do not even bother!

Handling Clients

Just make sure your demand is for the exact sum you can prove, and are claiming……EXACTLY! Your in and out in about 15 mins…….. You can actually do this bit yourself, but some people take this as being more serious when it comes from a leach!

#8 Start proceedings:

OK you have done your list…. keep it and update as you get evidence together. Every single email, every scrap of paper, every diary, every phone log, every conversation you can remember with dates, times, and places. Then copy the lot and file. Originals 1, and two copies of copies. One for him, and one for you. Do not miss out anything! It is really hard to add in later because you forgot!

Do your calculations and make sure they add up, then do them again, then give to someone to calculate. Itemize every calculation, dates times and places. Then give it to someone who you trust and would give you an honest feedback. NOT YOUR LAWYER…. I said honest feedback.

Do your list again. If you have a case, chances are it has grown to more positives. if it has grown to more negatives…… re-examine your position.

Filing your claim:

Write down all the facts, everything thats relevant, in particular, the absolutes, log them and give to lawyer for putting into gobbledygook nonsense language for other lawyers who speak gobbledygook nonsense language. Put all your evidence (copies) with this summary and get your lawyer to file…… you are still not interested in talking about the case……… why? because it does not really matter…. yet!

The issue has not come to the trial yet, and as long as you have included the important details of the transaction , and what you are claiming, there is little need to put any more down…. wait for them to respond!

Proving the facts dont really matter yet as you and the other guy know what you meant, so its negotiation stage to lawyers, (they dont expect it to go to court) only…. try to resolve it, with a different aspect by looking through your lawyers eyes.

Look at courts as a examination, and one you want to pass, which you can only do if your honest to yourself in your claim, and can actually prove that claim.

The Traitors Within

Seeing it will take all the house, where of course the republicans hold the majority of senate seats and that of President, to sit and decide who will be house speaker, Paul Ryan speaks of getting behind the new President Elect and supporting him as we go forward.

He says ““We need to seize this moment, and come together like never before,” the Wisconsin Republican wrote in a letter to the House GOP. “We cannot be timid about this: the country has voted for change, and we must deliver.” (here)

Its interesting to note that Ryan like all the Liberals, the democrats, the gay rights, the Black Lives Matter, Lesbians, Commentators, The President, the Pollsters and just about everyone in CNN did not see that the country wanted change….. but TRUMP did!

Its also interesting to note that while all, including the whole of the party Trump was representing, blatantly refused to support him in his efforts.

From Congressmen, to leading party officials he was dismissed as a flash in the pan that could not possibly gain enough votes to succeed to the presidency.

Now, as Trump honors those that did risk all of their careers to support him, the likes of Ryan thinks he is going to be able to persuade the party he is the right man for the job of speaker for a second year.

He thinks that appealing to the rank and file is going to somehow propel him to the status he believes he deserves, yet, what Ryan simply does not understand is that it will not be possible for any to go against Trump, should he decide to change for a man with more backbone.

If Trump can change the minds of so many voters, who have given up on the status quo politicians, turning all peoples into a formidable force to counter those that were backstabbing, when they should have been supportive, it will be a mere walk in the park to send Ryan to oblivion.

Trump for good or Bad?

Being an avid ready of alternative groups ( working on the theory that the mainstream media lies to us all the time) like “The Conservative Treehouse” who predicted back in March the rise and subsequent election of Trump by a strong margin, I put a bet on that he would win. Its nice to beat the bookies.

I wonder what would have happened if I turned up to get my winnings and the bookie says I get nothing! He says that although I picked the right person he is not going to pay because he is changing the rules…….? So now I lose because he has changed the rules. Crazy eh? What would YOU do?

This week has seen demonstrators out for their fourth night on the streets. There were protests in New York, Los Angeles, Miami, Salt Lake City, Las Vegas, Kansas City, Chicago and Washington DC and violence in Portland.

Most of the protestors seem to be young college students with BLM and Gays rights being thrown in for good measure. These young people are backed up by those in the news that were swearing they would leave the USA for good if Trump were voted in, and those same actresses, actors, comedians, are now subject to a poll on RT  as to whether they should be FORCED to leave as they were so outspoken.

It is sad that people in the news would interfere in the voting process at all. To state how they would vote I see as being legitimate, to actively try to persuade by using your popularity seems to be bad form.

To not carry out your threat to leave seems worse still. The least that Robert, Barbara and the like could do is carry out their threat, but instead dismiss it as a joke.

Its only a joke when people laugh, and riots are no laughing matter!


We all need a Hero!

Last night I watched ‘Jack the Giant Slayer’ an enjoyable movie that bares all the hall marks of a successful film.

A guy from humble beginnings without education or a future, trades a horse for some beans. Getting chastised by his guardian for being a fool, but catching the eye of the beautiful Princess, whom he later eventually wins on the basis of his prowess in battle with an ability to eventually beat the giants.

This a new take on an old theme of Jack and the beanstalk, replacing the old theme with a slightly different story line, together with some excellent animations.

But this particular story is adapted from much older stories, who I have no doubt were all adapted from one single author only to be converted into many languages using their local heroes and heroines.

In most languages (and religions) the Messiah was to be a saviour or liberator of people, and generally the saviour of those the author was part of, with the notion living on because of the connection to his own people.

Most races have this saviour carefully adapted to reflect their local conditions, and the names of course being promoted to cement the local guy into history.

Jesus was said to be the messiah, coming from humble beginnings to rid the world of evil and to eventually point the direction humanity must go, even to the extent that he would be sacrificed as a good hero might. Although paying the supreme sacrifice he will return in time to save us by defeating the antichrist or false Messiah.

The Qur’an states that Isa, the Son of Mariam (Arabic: Isa ibn Maryam), is the Messiah and Prophet sent to the Children of Israel.[Quran 3:45] Muslims believe Isa is alive in Heaven and will return to Earth to defeat the Masih ad-Dajjal (false Messiah),[6] a figure similar to the Antichrist in Christianity, who will emerge shortly before him before Yawm al-Qiyāmah (“the Day of Resurrection”).

How about Spartacus as a hero of humble beginnings that defeated his masters to become a great leader. True he died, but sometimes even the hero is required for the supreme sacrifice.

Moses was another of humble birth being delivered in a basket of reeds to his adopted mother to save him from a purge of infant children, eventually finding him to be the leader of men and saving a race.

In historical biblical times the hero was never averse to killing, murdering many people as long as it was in the name of justice.

A sort of olden day Arnie (Terminator) or perhaps Charles ( Death Wish). You might also pick Mel (Mad Max)

There is no shortage of heroes. In the UK we have Robin Hood, who faced with the bad sheriff defending the right of the poor against impossible odds. The popularity of Mel (again) as the Scottish landowners son (William Wallace) who after his humble beginnings once again rises to be the leader or messiah.

One thing is for sure……. we  all need a Hero!

Out with the Old……..

Party hats and bells and whistles.

Last night of the year, and what do I do?…….celebrate in style……ending up in, of all places, a Karaoke bar….LOL. I listened to bad singers, and others making a statement, as we sort of welcomed in the new while saying good bye to the old.

I missed absent family, and friends, babies and adults, and reminisce of those good times that have been had, smiling to myself that I have, in my life had many more good times than bad.

I got to thinking that worldly stuff of all the trials and tribulations that seem to be never ending in the world.

Wars that drag on, and the hands of friendship offered on an international scale that have all the hallmarks of actually achieving some peace instead of creating a war.

Deciding that all Leaders time after time make the same mistakes as their predecessor, because of all things, you cant put an old experienced head on new shoulders, so the inevitable mistakes occur, over and over again.

So where are we on the humanitarian scale this year?

For me these hands of friendship reaching out internationally, and the small step back from nuclear proliferation, awareness of a potential global warming (even though there is great debate of its evidence) the celebrations of people with a conscience, marred by the parting of some of those notables that made a difference, makes me optimistic for the future.

So whatever your take on the past year, whatever you have been doing, we can all look to clearing the slate and take the 1st of January 2014 as an opportunity to change to refocus our goals. If you did not make it last year……….. make it this 2014.