Muslim or Not?

The current wave of atrocities done in the name of the Muslim faith are spanning the whole globe.

From London to Russia, the USA to the Philippines. It seems that the Muslim faith drags in many believers and a certain element of extreme people, that believe in taking their writings to the extreme.

The left wing, bless em! in their very brave attempt to De-stigmatize and make all peoples neutral with equal say and balance for all, is demonstrated in so many circles and on so many levels its hard to shrug this off as a fad.

The extreme leftists like Corbyn and the ‘New Labour Party’ with snowflake liberals that continually fight all aspects of the system to enhance a populist belief in full integration.

US universities attempt to alleviate any concerns by pushing their system farther to left and consequentially more extreme.

One School took it upon themselves to give Christian children lessons in Islam taken to the extreme of actually praying.

As you notice in the film, many parents are upset and yet the board are eager to cut all people off after just being allowed two minutes to state their case, seemingly oblivious to these concerns of parents.

I am not anti Islam, or anti any religion, but if any religion preaches the opposite of what they are being allowed when welcomed to other countries then assimilation will be impossible for future generations.

Anjem Choudary makes absolutely no secret of his aspirations for the future, and is never apologetic for the violence, using tactics of aversion, or denial to put his message across.

Even to the extent of claiming Sharia Law will be the law of the UK one day, yet still left-wing politicians do nothing at all to attempt to stop this hatred at its core level being propagated.

True Choudary was jailed, but for the wrong reasons and it does little to stem the flow of laws that are incompatible with most western societies.

Perhaps that flow can never be stopped if our leaders have a fundamentally different agenda to the people that elect them. A fairly good analogy could be demonstrated in this video…..

It seems that there is actually no problem with radical Muslims at all. They are not actually part of the faith and instead are a separate series of individuals acting on their own independently their holy leaders like Choudary.

As such, according to politicians, you cannot tar a whole faith with the same brush!

Beheaded

This man is not a Muslim Terrorist it would seem. His belief however is that any infidel deserves this treatment and is one of seven billion that are happy to hand out the same punishment to all, from Coptic Christians to British troops on our streets.

It would seem that peoples that have escaped countries that practice Sharia Law are intent on bringing it back for themselves in future generations in their new found homelands.

C6bsia4XEAA3KPM

Even when they still suffer the same extreme penalties of an antiquated religion.

Sharia law_001

This falls nothing short of an erosion of the western society with an active target of spreading their faith with total eradication of any that specifically do not subscribe to their faith.

For instance if I deny Allah and take a stance of say…. an atheist……. this religion believes that anyone that kills me is not guilty of any offense!

That cannot be compatible with any western sort of thinking!

Advertisements

Preparing for War!

There are two interconnected things that really bother me today.

The first is the misconception that Russia is preparing for war. Reports  this morning are that Russia is beefing up its missiles on its border :-

Russia has announced it will deploy its nuclear-capable Iskander missiles in retaliation for NATO’s military shield on Russia’s western borders. (here)

Russian President Vladimir Putin also said Russia had to react to what it perceived as being a threat from US-led forces in eastern Europe.

‘Why are we reacting to NATO expansion so emotionally? We are concerned by NATO’s decision making,’ RIA quoted him as saying.

He added: ‘What should we do? We have, therefore, to take countermeasures, which means to target with our missile systems the facilities, that, in our opinion, start posing a threat to us.’

NATO orders four additional battalions to Russian border

That was on June 14th 2016 (here) where under the guise of defending Europe against attacks from Iran (Go figure) they need to place hundreds of missiles along Russia’s border. They have been increasing ever since.

America Trashes NATO Founding Act; Rushes Weapons to Russia’s Borders

The NATO Founding Act was agreed to between the US and Russia in 1997 in order to provide to Russia’s leader Boris Yeltsin some modicum of assurance that America wouldn’t invade his country. (here)

The USA told a bare faced lie to the Russians and yet…we claim HIM to be the aggressor.
What NATO is doing is so very foolish and at the beck and call of Obama, is not a smart thing to do.
The first point is that appeasing Obama is all well and good, but in the event of war it will be Europe that suffers the most.
Additionally perhaps the US thinks its insulated, and that perhaps it would not feel any potential threats? But realistically the Russians have been building less tanks and more subs like all the main countries in the world, and, what is the betting there a couple sitting within striking distance of NY right NOW.
That is apart from EMP Electromagnetic Pulse that have now been effected by most governments that can render all electrical machines and communications useless… from a couple of hundred miles UP! (here) As hard as Europe gets it …. so would the USA!

The second is the very real threat to Donald Trump. Over the last few weeks you have had more and more threats to him as he progressed towards the Presidency.

This would be convenient to some and has been suggested by media sites like the Conservative Tree-house many times. Obama wants war, and to stop Trump! What a perfect scenario for that happening!

We all need a Hero!

Last night I watched ‘Jack the Giant Slayer’ an enjoyable movie that bares all the hall marks of a successful film.

A guy from humble beginnings without education or a future, trades a horse for some beans. Getting chastised by his guardian for being a fool, but catching the eye of the beautiful Princess, whom he later eventually wins on the basis of his prowess in battle with an ability to eventually beat the giants.

This a new take on an old theme of Jack and the beanstalk, replacing the old theme with a slightly different story line, together with some excellent animations.

But this particular story is adapted from much older stories, who I have no doubt were all adapted from one single author only to be converted into many languages using their local heroes and heroines.

In most languages (and religions) the Messiah was to be a saviour or liberator of people, and generally the saviour of those the author was part of, with the notion living on because of the connection to his own people.

Most races have this saviour carefully adapted to reflect their local conditions, and the names of course being promoted to cement the local guy into history.

Jesus was said to be the messiah, coming from humble beginnings to rid the world of evil and to eventually point the direction humanity must go, even to the extent that he would be sacrificed as a good hero might. Although paying the supreme sacrifice he will return in time to save us by defeating the antichrist or false Messiah.

The Qur’an states that Isa, the Son of Mariam (Arabic: Isa ibn Maryam), is the Messiah and Prophet sent to the Children of Israel.[Quran 3:45] Muslims believe Isa is alive in Heaven and will return to Earth to defeat the Masih ad-Dajjal (false Messiah),[6] a figure similar to the Antichrist in Christianity, who will emerge shortly before him before Yawm al-Qiyāmah (“the Day of Resurrection”).

How about Spartacus as a hero of humble beginnings that defeated his masters to become a great leader. True he died, but sometimes even the hero is required for the supreme sacrifice.

Moses was another of humble birth being delivered in a basket of reeds to his adopted mother to save him from a purge of infant children, eventually finding him to be the leader of men and saving a race.

In historical biblical times the hero was never averse to killing, murdering many people as long as it was in the name of justice.

A sort of olden day Arnie (Terminator) or perhaps Charles ( Death Wish). You might also pick Mel (Mad Max)

There is no shortage of heroes. In the UK we have Robin Hood, who faced with the bad sheriff defending the right of the poor against impossible odds. The popularity of Mel (again) as the Scottish landowners son (William Wallace) who after his humble beginnings once again rises to be the leader or messiah.

One thing is for sure……. we  all need a Hero!

Race Issues or Race Baiting?

On December 14th 2013 the National Black Caucus of State Legislators had their Annual Legislative conference discussing the Civil Rights Agenda.

Definitely a mouthful. A forum to discuss Civil Rights and again they thrust the Trayvon Martin foundation to the podium where it seems, that amongst (some of the minority population) at least the NAACP and associates will not let this issue in the Zimmerman case….. die its natural death.

The Black Grievance Industry are determined not to let their cause célèbre go without a fight.

The discussion in part discussed why some of their protests fall on deaf ears after the initial furor has died down. Why their is no subsequent support from all segments of the community to prevail in some campaigns.

The particular case of Trayvon Martin is perhaps the least likely to succeed with the majority of the the population for many reasons, least of all the public disclosure of the offensive and underhand way that the BGI chose to single out and manipulate an overly liberal media with distortions.

That, in itself has made the criticism of any black event a racial issue (rather than an observation) to the extent that for fear of media suicide, it becomes so much easier, and safer to simply not comment or support as a safe route.

The term ‘Black Grievance Industry’ was first coined by Treepers on the Conservative Tree House who’s reporters (Treepers) were quick to notice that support from certain black Civil Rights advocates that make their daily bread out of actively creating an issue that has its nuclease in race, bringing it to the forefront whether it be true or not, using it to facilitate support and donations which in turn find their way back to the BGI.

This industry appears to do more by driving a wedge into a common link for people in general when discussing social issues such as gun law and civil rights by manipulating the media.  The public have finally understood their bias, and, are much more aware of their motives, and when you cry wolf, it is sometimes so hard to be heard subsequently.

The American Thinker says of the new book by Jack Cashill:-

“The definitive account of the conspiracy to send George Zimmerman to prison for the self-defense shooting of Trayvon Martin”

Read more here    A must read for all those that are really interested in race….. and race baiting…………

Image

The BGI had a vested interest in the prosecution of George Zimmerman that went above and beyond that of putting a wrong to right. Its very existence and, the extravagance of the players that demands that the event needs to be kept in the front of any campaign because of its ability to produce returns far in excess of all contributions that other issues may demonstrate.

National Black Caucus of State Legislators need to look no further than events such as this to see why they do not get support from all walks of the communities, white as well as black, to support their views.

A white person does not feel connected if support is required for a ‘National Black Caucus’ as, ‘black’ is not demonstrative of people in general, and when examining SYG, or gun control, the black community is responsible for the majority of violence (when they reflect such a small percentage of the population) and appear not to be prepared to step up to the plate when getting their house in order.

In order to gain support you need to have common ground or interest in an event which, when deemed a black, white or sky blue pink event, automatically disconnects those that that are not part of that group. No matter how worthy of support, to disconnect those that might otherwise be supportive has to be non productive.

In any event the Zimmerman trial was held with the blessing of the BGI, and the jurors selected were also sanctioned by the BGI only to get a verdict (on the basis of evidence) that was not to their liking, and have subsequently denounced the verdict the judge, the jurors and just about anyone else that agrees with the methods of American Justice.

It is simply not reasonable to demand an arrest, a trial, and a public whipping, only to disagree with a verdict especially when evidence is manipulated, withheld and distorted by the prosecution to the degree of criminality to appease the BGI.  Such is the power of the BGI in the USA today.

The obvious tack if you want results as a caucus of any sort, don’t make it a black issue, make it an our issue. But crying wolf with the Martin case will not endear the support of people in general.

And the BGI? is it Race Issues, or Race Baiting?

Perspectives: Israel… Iran……The Great Satans

I once thought the best alternative for humanity was equality. What I know is that people and even nations are not equal. There are those with power and those without. If we examine the facts though, what do we get?

Israel wants Iran never to have nuclear weapons, and indeed Iran accepts this as part of the agreement when they joined the Non Proliferation Treaty.

The NPT is often seen to be based on a central bargain: “the NPT non-nuclear-weapon states agree never to acquire nuclear weapons and the NPT nuclear-weapon states in exchange agree to share the benefits of peaceful nuclear technology and to pursue nuclear disarmament aimed at the ultimate elimination of their nuclear arsenals”

Israel does not have to worry about this as Israel does not belong to the treaty (signing not ratified).

Israel, once again is sabre rattling the war drums with Iran, and it seems that every time we hear from them they want war.

Seeking to discourage a rapprochement between Washington and Tehran, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel threatened military action against Iran and dared others to do the same.

“Israel will not allow Iran to get nuclear weapons,” Netanyahu told the U.N. General Assembly. “If Israel is forced to stand alone, Israel will stand alone. Yet in standing alone, Israel will know that we will be defending many, many others.”

Gone were the Israeli leader’s usual witty comments – although he is always an interesting orator. And gone was any new commitment or analysis of peace with the Palestinians.

Read More:

He goes on to say:

“The only difference between them is this: Ahmadinejad was a wolf in wolf’s clothing. Rouhani is a wolf in sheep’s clothing, a wolf who thinks he can pull the wool over the eyes of the international community.”

In fact there are other notable issues that the rest of the world adheres to, but Israel does not. For instance the countries that actually that admit to having nuclear weapons.

The five nuclear-weapon states under the NPT

United States of America, United Kingdom, France, Russia, China

Non-NPT nuclear powers

Pakistan, India, North Korea

And the remainder:

Undeclared nuclear powers

Israel

A policy of deliberate ambiguity (also known as a policy of strategic ambiguity) is the practice by a country of being intentionally ambiguous on certain aspects of its foreign policy or whether it possesses certain weapons of mass destruction. It may be useful if the country has contrary foreign and domestic policy goals or if it wants to take advantage of risk aversion to abet a deterrence strategy. Such a policy can be very risky as it may cause misinterpretation of a nation’s intentions, leading to actions that contradict that nation’s wishes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Policy_of_deliberate_ambiguity

In this video of nuclear testing, it does not show testing for Israel, so either they have not tested, or another country has tested for them.

Nuclear testing: All countries

This is the position that Israel adopts, and one that must be considered detrimental to the group as a whole, but is accepted, not by nations as a whole but by the US, and forced on other nations as acceptable. The general acceptance appears to be at least in one respect, because the US refuses to ratify the agreement (and is the only main player not to do so).

Israel for their part use this as a basis as to why they need not even acknowledge actually having a weapon at all even though they have approximately 100-200 weapons.

Iran for their part is a full party to the NPT, and claims that the moving of goal posts by inspectors inspired by the US, is unethical, and for the most part have stayed within the confines of legislation, and do not have nuclear weapons. Israel do not, and will not let arms inspectors into the country.

The obvious problem here is that a member of the NPT is not only being penalized for being a member, it is also being threatened by countries in and outside the NPT, which cannot instill confidence in the system.

If there is one thing that would motivate Iran to actually go to the step of making an atomic bomb, and have full capability of delivery, may be the constant threats of attack by other nations. or even an attack itself.

2,700-year-old Persian artifact a gift of U.S. diplomacy to Iran?

Very interesting developments are occurring between the US and Iran. The old hard line from both sides appears to be giving way to a thawing that has all the hall marks of something good.

Washington (CNN) — A 2,700 year-old silver chalice may be a new token of friendship between the United States and Iran, at least that’s the way Iran’s cultural heritage chief sees it.

Whatever the case, Mohammad-Ali Najafi was palpably delighted Friday to see the ancient Persian artifact return to its homeland. The ceremonial drinking vessel — or rhyton — had gotten snagged in a U.S. customs warehouse for years, held up by bad diplomatic relations.

It had been in New York since 2003, when an art dealer smuggled it into the country from Iran.

Customs officials have long wanted to return the rhyton to Iran, according to a New York Post report. But decades of frigid relations between Washington and Tehran kept it frozen in bureaucratic limbo.

The issues between countries will never be solved by head to head rhetoric, and perhaps Obama’s recent success with Syria, even taking into account a lot of back peddling was involved, may have motivated more possibilities……

Read More:

Comparisons are being made of the latest round of mutual international diplomacy as being a ruse by Iran to ward off the now famous threat by Israel of what stage they will be forced to act .

In September of 2012, Benjamin Netanyahu famously gave his U.N. “red line” speech outlining the three stages of nuclear weapons development, and the point at which Israel would have no other course but to attack Iran.   Experts put that at the point that Iran has amassed enough uranium, purified to a level of 20 percent, that could quickly be enriched further and be used to produce an atomic bomb.

“At this late hour, there is only one way to peacefully prevent Iran from getting atomic bombs. That’s by placing a clear red line on Iran’s nuclear program,” Netanyahu said.

Others like myself do not believe this to be the case, as the Iranians may have enough fusion material for perhaps two or even three nuclear weapons. The relevance of this is that they are still outmatched in conventional weapons, by the US. In addition the Israeli’s have a reported 80 nuclear weapons, and the US has enough to end the planet.

Assuming you have three or even 30, heck go for gold and assume its 300 nuclear weapons, they are still tactically outmatched for sheer power, and the means to deliver, from all directions 24hrs a day.

Survival is to any country, regardless of its affiliations is of prime importance, and and action that results in the destruction of everything that would require decades to recover from cannot be an option.

Regardless of how we are brainwashed into thinking that we are mixing with third world despots, we are looking at the oldest modern civilization on earth, who has been through many crisis in their 7/8000yr history. None of which was to push to self annihilation.

Even when Sarin was killing a million of their own people when fighting a Iraq war led by Saddam Hussein, and backed by the US, they did not respond in kind, when, they could have.

Indeed it has been more than 600 yrs since Iran declared war on anyone, so why would we believe that they have changed today. If the comparison is made to the US who has dropped two nuclear bombs and been in continuous war for some 70 years, why would we believe that there has been a shift in the view that the Iranians have on war?

The problem of course is that threatening the Iranians continually, and allowing these threats to be made openly on US soil will force the prophecy to be self fulfilling on the basis that self preservation sometimes dictates that nuclear weapons are bad, but prudence forces the obvious solutions to external threats.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-17261265

Retrial for Marissa Alexander

UPDATE:

Well

Now personally I saw no reason to try her again, and the judicial system came under a lot of pressure from the NAACP and of course there was a huge public outcry from African Americans on the issue.

On the other hand, today she is free, well as free as you can be with an ankle bracelet and house arrest for the next two years.

The sad thing is the prosecutors recognized that she did not need to be in for twenty years… and that’s why the offered a plea, which incidentally had she taken she would have been out two years ago……….

I have no doubt that her lawyer would have told her that if she goes to trial on this occasion and pleads not guilty she WILL serve that 20 yrs behind bars, simply because its the law.

When your a black woman with some serious attitude, that would not learn the first time, its a sad lesson to learn about the system…… in this case, plead not guilty and there is absolutely nothing that could have been done for her.

I have to warn the woman…. the system is very unforgiving to those it has given a second chance, but I cannot help feeling with this proud black woman that it would take little effort for her to react….. we shall see…….

**************************************************************************

Here we go again!

This case is another that I will be looking at very closely during her upcoming trial. It stinks of racism, once again. The NAACP have been fighting against her sentence since the day she got it, on the basis that she should have come under the heading of SYG, even though, there has been a nationwide campaign to abolish SYG….. go figure!

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — A Florida woman serving 20 years in prison for firing a shot at her estranged husband during an argument will get a new trial, though she will not be able to invoke a “stand your ground” defense, an appeals court ruled Thursday.

The case of Marissa Alexander, a Jacksonville mother of three, has been used by critics of Florida’s “stand your ground” law and mandatory minimum sentences to argue that the state’s justice system is skewed against defendants who are black.

Marissa Alexander new trial

Once again a distorted view by the press, that have not been correctly reported by most publications.

See:http://mediatrackers.org/florida/2013/07/16/no-marissa-alexanders-conviction-was-not-a-reverse-trayvon-martin-case-in-florida

A rather good alternate opinion from Subhash Kateel at ‘Lets talk about it’

Another

http://news.msn.com/crime-justice/new-trial-ordered-for-fla-woman-who-got-20-years

http://www.beyondblackwhite.com/marissa-alexander-story-choose-wrong-man/

http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/07/19/marissa-alexander-florida-10-20-life-laws

http://theblackchannel.net/?page_id=67

There are a wide variety of web sites that have reported correctly with a certain reluctance from mainstream media to report the facts.

Kenyan shopping mall

Has British ‘White Widow’ been killed?

A dead white woman has been found among Islamic terrorists killed by soldiers as they stormed the mall where 62 shoppers were slaughtered this weekend, Kenyan officials said. It is thought to be Samantha Lewthwaite, widow of 7/7 bomber Jermaine Lindsay, wanted by Kenyan police on a string of terror charges.

Germaine Maurice Lindsay (23 September 1985 – 7 July 2005), also known as Abdullah Shaheed Jamal, was one of the four homegrown Islamist terrorists who detonated bombs on three trains on the London Underground and one bus in central London during the 7 July 2005 London bombings, killing 56 people (including themselves), and injuring more than 700. Lindsay detonated the bomb that killed 26 other people on a train travelling on the Piccadilly line between the King’s Cross St. Pancras and Russell Square tube stations.

Jamal's wife Samantha Lewthwaite
Moments after the news broke, Al Shabaab, the Al Qaeda affiliated terror group behind the massacre at Nairobi’s Westgate Shopping Centre, used their Twitter feed to claim that Lewthwaite was safe.

It actually brings on the worst issue ever…. home grown terrorists……. I don’t think that is a good point considering keeping track of the obvious ones is time consuming enough.
Its is strange though, an average British girl joining a terrorist group, making it so much more difficult to comprehend…..
UPDATE:
So this woman is not dead and they have not found her, a cloak of secrecy hangs over her……

This week, Reuters reported that one intelligence officer and two soldiers had told them that one of the dead militants in the raid on the Westgate mall was a white woman. Kenyan police officers refused to confirm or deny those reports to the Daily Beast.

“She has become a mythical figure.”

But the British Foreign Office said that they were investigating claims of Lewthwaite’s involvement and Scotland Yard said they were continuing to offer assistance to the Kenyan police operation.

It seems she has slipped the net

Pyongyang…. the next US target?

As one issue seems to be near fruition, another raises its merry head, this time in North Korea (again).

It seems two American experts  Joshua Pollack and Scott Kemp have been analyzing the possibility of the Atomic Bomb potential of Pyongyang.

The experts say material published in North Korean scientific publications and news media shows that Pyongyang is mastering domestic production of essential components for the gas centrifuges needed to make such bombs

Their report published in remarks prepared for delivery Wednesday at a Seoul symposium and provided in advance to The Associated Press.

The United States and others long suspected North Korea was clandestinely building a uranium program, despite denials from Pyongyang. U.S. officials confronted North Korea in 2002 with claims its scientists were pursuing uranium enrichment, sparking a nuclear crisis. In a reversal, visiting Americans were shown in November 2010 what they called a sophisticated, modern uranium enrichment facility with 2,000 centrifuges at the North’s main nuclear facility.

Notice similarities with a selection of countries that have the same rhetoric, and form part of “We’re Taking Down Seven Countries in Five Years” We’re going to start with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, then Libya, Somalia, Sudan, we’re going to come back and get Iran in five years.

by Gary Leupp….http://www.dissidentvoice.org, January 17, 2007

It is as if there is a perpetual war finding machine operating in the US with experts to give legitimacy to each and every conflict with experts saying exactly what the war machine wants.

Our experts say:

News media reports and unclassified government documents showed North Korea imported large amounts of centrifuge parts in the early 2000s, Pollack said, but an apparent dearth of observed imports since then suggests that Pyongyang is making the necessary components at home.

It seems to me that you could also deduce that they are no longer making them and therefore dont need them.

Pollack said he and Kemp found “strong and clear” evidence in state media photographs taken inside North Korean factories of specialized lathes that produce very strong metal cylinders needed for centrifuges. He also spoke of accounts in North Korean propaganda and technical journals of iron and steelmaking consistent with the production of an extremely hard steel alloy that can resist high rotational speeds in centrifuges, although the final step of the process wasn’t described.

Hopefully this is not the only “strong and clear” evidence they have, as, it is reminiscent of the tubes found Iraq, before Saddams downfall.

But then again I suppose the war machine needs very little evidence to substantiate their claims…..

Full AP report.

It seems almost anything today is proof of an atomic weapon……